Why was Aurangzeb blamed for the decline of Mughal Empire?
Table of Contents
- 1 Why was Aurangzeb blamed for the decline of Mughal Empire?
- 2 Who is considered to be responsible for the decline of the Mughal Empire?
- 3 Which of the following factors were not responsible for the decline of Mughal Empire?
- 4 How far Aurangzeb was responsible for downfall of Mughal Empire?
- 5 How did the successors of Aurangzeb contribute to the downfall of the Mughal Empire?
- 6 Was the in fighting between Aurangzeb successors the most important reason for the collapse of the Mughal Empire explain your answer?
Why was Aurangzeb blamed for the decline of Mughal Empire?
He was intolerant of other religions. By reversing the liberal policies of Akbar, he dealt a serious blow to the foundation of the Mughal empire. Because of this attitude, he lost the support of the Rajputs and Sikhs who became bitter enemies of the Mughal.
Who is considered to be responsible for the decline of the Mughal Empire?
Aurangzeb
E.g the beginnings of the decline of the Mughal empire can be traced back to Aurangzeb who inherited a large empire and yet adopted an expansionist policy. The objective of Aurangzeb to unify the entire country under one Central political authority was justifiable in theory but not in practice.
How far Aurangzeb was responsible for the decline of Mughal?
Three of Aurangzeb’s policies which were responsible for the decline of the Mughal Empire: Costly, long drawn and ruinous Deccan campaigns. Numerous wars with the Sikhs, Marathas, Jats and Rajputs.
How did the successors of Aurangzeb contribute to the downfall of the Mughal Empire 7 marks?
The successors of Aurangzeb were weak and became victims of the intrigues and conspiracies of the faction-ridden nobles. They were inefficient generals and incapable of suppressing revolts. The absence of a strong ruler, an efficient bureaucracy and a capable army had made the Mughal Empire weak.
Which of the following factors were not responsible for the decline of Mughal Empire?
The arrival of the British was not responsible for the decline of the Mughal Empire. Nobles of the Mughal empire were really selfish and had rivalry amongst themselves and just degraded the wealth of the Empire. Since there was unity amongst the regional powers they began to succeed the Mughals.
How far Aurangzeb was responsible for downfall of Mughal Empire?
To sustain long costly wars, Aurangzeb obviously needed money for his armies and so he levied heavy taxes on the people including the Jizya tax on non-Muslims. This caused immense displeasure in the people and resulted in political instability in the empire.
Why the successors of Aurangzeb failed to prevent the decline of the Mughal Empire?
The successive rulers after Aurangzeb were weak and lacked the character, motivation and commitment to rule the empire strongly. They had become ease loving and cowardly. They totally disregarded their state duties and were unable to detain the declining empire from its fall.
Which three policies of Aurangzeb were responsible for the decline of the Mughal Empire?
Three of Aurangzeb’s policies which were responsible for the decline of the Mughal Empire:
- Costly, long drawn and ruinous Deccan campaigns.
- Numerous wars with the Sikhs, Marathas, Jats and Rajputs.
How did the successors of Aurangzeb contribute to the downfall of the Mughal Empire?
Was the in fighting between Aurangzeb successors the most important reason for the collapse of the Mughal Empire explain your answer?
The infighting for the throne greatly weakened the Mughal Empire. times. Mughal Kingdom was reduced to an area 300 miles long and 100 miles wide near Delhi within 100 years after the death of Aurangzeb. The rise of the British power was the main reason of the decline of the Mughals.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtO3xll9Fqg