Popular lifehacks

What is an undecidable language?

What is an undecidable language?

For an undecidable language, there is no Turing Machine which accepts the language and makes a decision for every input string w (TM can make decision for some input string though). A decision problem P is called “undecidable” if the language L of all yes instances to P is not decidable.

How can you prove that a language is undecidable?

Your language L is indeed undecidable. This can be shown by reducing the halting problem to L: For the halting problem instance (N, y), create a new machine M for the L problem. On input x, M simulates (N, y) for length(x) steps. If the simulation halted within that number of steps, then M halts.

Which of the following are undecidable problem?

Which of the following problems is undecidable? Deciding if a given context-free grammar is ambiguous. Deciding if a given string is generated by a given context-free grammar. Deciding if the language generated by a given context-free grammar is empty.

READ ALSO:   What is the relationship between the natural rate of unemployment and the natural rate of output?

Which among the following are undecidable theories?

3. Which among the following are undecidable theories? Explanation: Tarski and Mostowski in 1949, established that the first order theory of natural numbers with addition, multiplication, and equality is an undecidable theory.

Are all Undecidable languages recognizable?

Note: Decidable languages are closed under complementation, but recognizable languages are not. – Write-only means (a) symbol on output tape does not affect transitions, and (b) tape head only moves right. Note M need not enumerate strings in order.

Which of the following languages W is undecidable?

L1 is undecidable. According to Rice’s theorem, emptiness problem of Turing machine is undecidable.

Which of the following is are undecidable G is a CFG?

Correct Option: D 1. G is a CFG.

Which of the following statement is false in context of tree terminology?

2. Which of the following statement is false in context of tree terminology? Explanation: A node has atmost one parent, drawn above the node, and zero or more children drawn below. There is one node, one root, that has no parent; this node appears to be at the top of the tree.