Is it pair of pants or pairs of pants?
Table of Contents
Is it pair of pants or pairs of pants?
In U.S. English, two pairs of pants is correct because a pair of pants is a garment for one person and the plural of pair is pairs.
Is it correct to say pair of pants?
“Pair,” from the Latin, means two like things. And pants (pantaloons) were originally two like things. You put them on one leg at a time because they actually came in two pieces. From the beginning, about the 16th Century, pants have been referred to as a pair.
Is pants singular or plural?
Both pants and shorts are plural nouns. You use a plural form of a verb with them.
Is it pair of jeans or pairs of jeans?
To talk about one piece of clothing we say “a pair of jeans”. For more than one we say “pairs of jeans”. You can also just say “jeans” for one pair. To call it “a jean” is incorrect.
Do you say pair or pairs?
And here’s Garner’s: “The preferred plural of pair is pairs. In nonstandard usage, pair often appears as a plural.” So our advice is to use “pairs” in a situation like this: “Each package contains six pairs of socks.” Now for the dissenting voices, those that would not rule out “six pair.”
What is the plural of pair of pants?
Answer. The plural form of pair of pants is pairs of pants. Find more words! Another word for.
What is the singular of pants?
“Pants”, originally from “pantaloons”, is plural, used with plural verbs, as in “My pants are on fire!” or “Those pants have your name written all over them.” Its singular, “pant”, hath not an s, and is used (however rarely) to refer to a pant leg.
Why do we say pants?
The word ‘pants’ comes to us from an Anglicization of the character’s name, “Pantaloon.” When trousers of a similar style became popular during the Restoration in England, they became known as pantaloons, Pantaloon being an Anglicization of Pantalone.
Can we say a pants?
“Pants” is correct. We don’t say “He is wearing a pant.”
Is a pair of pants singular?
A pair of pants is singular, because pair is singular. Five pairs of pants is plural for the same reason. The noun pants is not used in a singular form without the final “s”. Interestingly, the synonyms for pants follow the same pattern (jeans, shorts, trousers, slacks, etc.).
Why is the word pants plural?
From its inception in English, pants has been plural. It’s a shortened adaptation of pantaloons, those tight-like leg coverings worn by pirates and Shakespearean characters. And in those eras of 300 or 400 years ago, before pants were a single entity, pants were actually two separate garments.
Can you have a pair of pairs?
They are both plural. You can have a pair of something. A pair of shoes, for example. But you can also have pairs of pairs; a plurality of plurals.