Is SpaceX cheaper than ISRO?

Therefore, for practical purposes, SpaceX is more affordable than ISRO’s most inexpensive rocket. Moreover, SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy can launch 63,800 kg payloads to Low Earth Orbit (LEO), six times than GSLV Mark III’s capability. At a $90 million per launch, payload delivery cost by Falcon Heavy to LEO is $1,410/kg.

Is ISRO more efficient than NASA?

While considering the success rate of any mission, ISRO tops the list. PSLV launched by ISRO has a success rate about of 93\%. ISRO’s Mangalyaan mission/ Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM) had a total expenditure of around $74 million while the MAVEN mission by NASA for Mars had a total expenditure of $672 million.

Which is the cheapest rocket?

By late 2013, with a published price of US$56.5 million per launch to low Earth orbit, “Falcon 9 rockets [were] already the cheapest in the industry….2010s: Competition and pricing pressure.

Which is better SpaceX or ISRO?

The race to put the most satellites in space is heating up. Elon Musk’s SpaceX has successfully placed 143 satellites in orbit, beating the record set by the Indian Space Research Organisation in 2017, when the PSLV-C37 launched 104 satellites.

Why are SpaceX launches cheaper?

The government had previously insisted that such “national security” satellites be launched aboard brand new rockets, but SpaceX has successfully re-flown used rockets for other customers 38 times now. But introducing reusability cuts all launch costs by the same amount it cuts government launch costs.

How does ISRO make profit?

The revenue earned by the commercial arm of India’s space agency rose by around 40 per cent in 2018-19 to Rs 324.19 crore from Rs 232.56 crore last year, helped by satellite launches for foreign customers. In five years revenue generated by launching satellites for other countries stood at Rs 1,245.17 crore.