Was Kierkegaard a Hegelian?

Kierkegaard draws a great distinction between tragic heroes who represent the Hegelian philosophical outlook and the knights of faith who represent his own philosophical outlook. Tragic heroes are rooted in the ethical (or the universal) so they can be understood and sympathized with.

What did Soren Kierkegaard believe?

For his emphasis on individual existence—particularly religious existence—as a constant process of becoming and for his invocation of the associated concepts of authenticity, commitment, responsibility, anxiety, and dread, Søren Kierkegaard is generally considered the father of existentialism.

What do Kierkegaard and Nietzsche have in common?

Kierkegaard and Nietzsche both felt that life is irrational. They were problem thinkers who chose not to follow the systematic approach to philosophy as their predecessors did. In this regard, they stood on common ground.

What did Søren Kierkegaard focus on?

Søren Kierkegaard focused on subjective human experience rather than the objective truths of mathematics and science, which he believed were too detached or observational to truly get at the human experience.

What is the purpose of reading Kierkegaard?

Reading Kierkegaard is meant to engender a profound awareness of how flawed our understanding is, how subjective it truly is. He uses Hegelian dialectic to make knowing more difficult. There is no system that can give us knowledge and all of them lead us away from knowing a damn thing.

What do Nietzsche and Kierkegaard have in common?

Kierkegaard’s knight of faith and Nietzsche’s Übermensch are representative of people who exhibit Freedom, in that he define the nature of their own existence. Nietzsche’s idealized individual invents his own values and creates the very terms he excel under.

What is the irony in Kierkegaard’s irony?

Irony is meant to engender a lack of knowledge for Kierkegaard. For him, we are not supposed to come away from irony knowing things but knowing that we know less. Reading Kierkegaard is meant to engender a profound awareness of how flawed our understanding is, how subjective it truly is. He uses Hegelian dialectic to make knowing more difficult.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko_2f-k0TL8