What is M Nagaraj vs Union of India case?

Nagaraj v. Union of India. In it, the Court validated Parliament’s decision to extend reservations for SC/STs to include promotions (reservation in promotion). Specifically, the Nagaraj judgement laid down three controlling conditions that the State must meet prior to granting a SC/ST a reservation in promotion.

What was the decision of the Supreme Court in case Indira Sawhney and others vs Union of India?

Union of India held that reservations cannot be applied in promotions. 1992 Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India judgment laid down the limits of the state’s powers: it upheld the ceiling of 50 per cent quotas, emphasized the concept of “social backwardness”, and prescribed 11 indicators to ascertain backwardness.

In which case the Supreme Court held that the reservation under Article 15/4 in postgraduate medical courses is permitted?

Balaji v State of Mysore
In Balaji v State of Mysore, the Mysore Govt issued an order under Article 15(4) reserving seats in the medical and engineering colleges of the state as follows- backward Classes 28\%, more Backward Classes 20\%, Sc And ST 18\%. Thus 68\% of the seats were reserved and only 32\% were made available in the merit pool.

What is BK pavitra case?

DY Chandrachud, JJ has refused to review it’s verdict in B K Pavitra v Union of India, (2019) 16 SCC 129 wherein it had upheld the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority to Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservations (to the Posts in the Civil Services of the State) …

What was the outcome of the Indira Sawhney and others vs the Government of India case class 9?

What is the Indra Sawhney Judgement? On 16 November 1992, the Supreme Court, in its verdict, upheld the government order, being of the opinion that caste was an acceptable indicator of backwardness.

In which case it was held that reservation of some seats in women’s colleges is not unconstitutional?

The 1993 Supreme Court ruling in the Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India case said that reservations in job promotions are “unconstitutional” or not in accordance with the political constitution but allowed its continuation for five years.

Why is Minerva Mills case important?

In the Minerva Mills case, the Supreme Court provided key clarifications on the interpretation of the basic structure doctrine. The court ruled that the power of the parliament to amend the constitution is limited by the constitution.