What is a meritocratic society in sociology?

Meritocracy is a social system in which advancement in society is based on an. individual’s capabilities and merits rather than on the basis of family, wealth, or social.

What is the possible consequences of meritocracy?

Among low status groups, research finds a positive relationship between endorsing meritocracy and a greater sense of control (McCoy et al., 2013); yet, in the long run it is associated with lower self-esteem, self-blame, and depression (Major et al., 2007), and also higher blood pressure (Eliezer et al., 2011).

How is meritocracy false?

Meritocracy is argued to be a myth because, despite being promoted as an open and accessible method of achieving upward class mobility under neoliberal or free market capitalism, wealth disparity and limited class mobility remain widespread, regardless of individual work ethic.

What are examples of meritocracy?

For example, a firm with the highest IQ employees might fall down in areas such as innovation, design and sales that require diverse talents that aren’t captured by an IQ test. Having people who think very differently may be conductive to creativity.

Who believes in meritocracy sociology?

Functionalists Davis and Moore state that we live in a meritocratic society as the education system acts as a mechanism to ensure individuals do the right jobs (see role allocation). Therefore, individuals that work hard will be rewarded in society, whilst those who do not will not be rewarded.

How does meritocracy impact the possibilities for social mobility?

Those who have the credentials and merits will rise faster and go further compared to those who do not. Therefore, this creates gaps in society. Those who do not have the credentials will have a more challenging time trying to keep up with and to match those who do.

Who argues meritocracy is a myth?

Marxists criticise the functionalist view of role allocation and “sifting and sorting” arguing that the appearance of meritocracy is nothing but ideology.

What is the ideology of meritocracy?

Meritocracy is a social system in which success and status in life depend primarily on individual talents, abilities, and effort. Social scientists often refer to this as the “bootstrap ideology,” evoking the popular notion of “pulling” oneself “up by the bootstraps.”

What’s the opposite of meritocracy?

The opposite of meritocracy is kakistocracy, or the rule of the worst.